⌘K /
Verified Primary Sources: NADC Open Data & Legacy Extracts (2015–Present) · FEC Schedule A / B / E & 24/48-Hr Notices · IRS Form 990 / BMF · USAspending.gov● Synced Oct 27, 2026 · Non-individual contributor policy enforced · Report a correction
← Candidate Comparison

KISHLA ASKINS

Democrat
Box colors:RepublicanDemocraticIndependent (blue) / other party (gray)Nonpartisan office, or no documented partyLegislature: red/blue = publicly documented party affiliation (the Legislature is officially nonpartisan on the ballot); green = no documented affiliation. SourcesDSA funding tie Funding tie to a DSA-affiliated committee in filings (how badges work)The DSA logo identifies the organization named in public filings. Plains Ledger is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DSA. A badge indicates a documented funding tie only.
U.S. House NE-02 · Federal · committee: KISHLA ASKINS FOR CONGRESS
Total raised (NADC)
$870,445
Sum of receipts filed with NADC for 2026 (partial). Data synced 2026-10-24.
Head-to-head
⚔ Head-to-head vs BRINKER HARDING
Default opponent: general-election opponent once nominees are set, otherwise the top-raising opposing-party candidate (nonpartisan races: top-raising other candidate).

Where the money came from

Source typeAmountShare
Organization & committee contributions (itemized ties)$119,10813.7%
Individuals & all other receipts$751,33786.3%
Via ActBlue: $114,396 in earmarked individual contributions. This is part of the individual rows above, not extra money.
Source: Nebraska Accountability & Disclosure Commission (NADC) filings, 2026 (partial).

In-state vs out-of-state

Nebraska: $22,400 (7.1%) · Out of state: $293,048 (92.9%)
Itemized receipts with an address only. Only state totals are shown; no ZIP-level figures, so no ZIP with fewer than 5 donors can be identified.

Outside spending (independent expenditures)

Supporting: $0 · Opposing: $0
None reported.
Plains Ledger independent-expenditure import. Spending is counted separately for each candidate it names: one ad backing one candidate and opposing another is reported for both, and these totals are not added together.

Top organization & PAC contributors

OrganizationTypeDirect
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PA PAC)PAC$2,500
INLAND EMPIRE STRIKES PAC; THEPAC$1,000
NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUNDCandidate committee$827
📌NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC PARTYParty committee$385
Organizations only. Individual donors are never named, and conduits such as ActBlue and WinRed are not listed as donors. Pinned organizations are always shown.

Funding by funder type

All organization ties in filings (direct, in-kind and independent expenditures), grouped by the funder type assigned from the filer record. Click a group to see its members, amounts and filings. Individuals are never named.
Ideological / issue PACs & groups · 2 · $3,500
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PA PAC) · PAC · Direct$2,500filings ↗
INLAND EMPIRE STRIKES PAC; THE · PAC · Direct$1,000filings ↗
ActBlue (conduit) · 1 · $114,396
ACTBLUE (GRASSROOTS CONDUIT PLATFORM) · Conduit / Platform (Dem/Prog) · Direct$114,396filings ↗
Small PACs & organizations (under $1,000 each) · 2 · $1,212
NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · Candidate committee · Direct$827filings ↗
NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC PARTY · Party committee · Direct$385filings ↗
Out-of-state organizations (state listed in filings): 4 · $4,712

Filings & sources

Payments to vendors

Top payee organizations this candidate's committee reported paying in this period (FEC/NADC expenditure filings, as of 2026-10-27). Lawful, itemized disclosures; not an indication of wrongdoing. Payments to individuals are aggregated. All vendors · rules
VendorPaymentsTotal
LAMAR2$51,580
UNIONIST PRINTING6$14,000
NEBRASKA SECRETARY OF STATE2$3,480
CATERING CREATIONS2$2,525
NATIONAL ACCOUNT SYSTEMS OF OMAHA8$2,406
AUTOMATIC PRINTING CO.2$2,066