⌘K /
Verified Primary Sources: NADC Open Data & Legacy Extracts (2015–Present) · FEC Schedule A / B / E & 24/48-Hr Notices · IRS Form 990 / BMF · USAspending.gov● Synced Oct 27, 2026 · Non-individual contributor policy enforced · Report a correction
← Candidate Comparison

JANET BOCK

Democrat (Legislature: nonpartisan ballot)Party: D (state party candidate list) source ↗
Box colors:RepublicanDemocraticIndependent (blue) / other party (gray)Nonpartisan office, or no documented partyLegislature: red/blue = publicly documented party affiliation (the Legislature is officially nonpartisan on the ballot); green = no documented affiliation. SourcesDSA funding tie Funding tie to a DSA-affiliated committee in filings (how badges work)The DSA logo identifies the organization named in public filings. Plains Ledger is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DSA. A badge indicates a documented funding tie only.
Legislative District 30 (LD-30) · State Legislature (Unicameral) · committee: JANET BOCK FOR LEGISLATURE
Total raised (NADC)
$121,251
Sum of receipts filed with NADC for 2026 (partial). Data synced 2026-10-24.
Head-to-head
⚔ Head-to-head vs CALLY IDEUS
Default opponent: general-election opponent once nominees are set, otherwise the top-raising opposing-party candidate (nonpartisan races: top-raising other candidate).

Where the money came from

Source typeAmountShare
Organization & committee contributions (itemized ties)$73,76160.8%
Individuals & all other receipts$47,48939.2%
Via ActBlue: $4,782 in earmarked individual contributions. This is part of the individual rows above, not extra money.
Source: Nebraska Accountability & Disclosure Commission (NADC) filings, 2026 (partial).

In-state vs out-of-state

Nebraska: $111,286 (91.6%) · Out of state: $10,250 (8.4%)
Itemized receipts with an address only. Only state totals are shown; no ZIP-level figures, so no ZIP with fewer than 5 donors can be identified.

Outside spending (independent expenditures)

Supporting: $5,490 · Opposing: $366
PRESERVE THE GOOD LIFESupport$5,000
LANCASTER COUNTY DEMOCRATSSupport$490
NEBRASKA RIGHT TO LIFE PACOppose$366
Plains Ledger independent-expenditure import. Spending is counted separately for each candidate it names: one ad backing one candidate and opposing another is reported for both, and these totals are not added together.

Top organization & PAC contributors

OrganizationTypeDirect
📌DEMOCRACY NEBRASKAPAC$50,000
📌WAY BACK PACPAC$10,000
CONRAD FOR LEGISLATURECandidate committee$5,000
WOMEN WHO RUN NEBRASKA PACPAC$2,750
NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PAC (union)PAC$2,500
CAMPAIGN FOR A HEALTHY NEBRASKAPAC$750
📌NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC PARTYParty committee$711
NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC WOMEN'S CAUCUSParty committee$500
NEBRASKA COOPERATIVE COUNCIL - POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEPAC$500
GAGE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY (DISSOLVED)Party committee$400
NEBRASKA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC NHAPACPAC$250
NEBRASKA NURSES ASSOCIATION PACPAC$250
VOTE VANESSA FOR LINCOLN AIRPORT AUTHORITYCandidate committee$150
Organizations only. Individual donors are never named, and conduits such as ActBlue and WinRed are not listed as donors. Pinned organizations are always shown.

Funding by funder type

All organization ties in filings (direct, in-kind and independent expenditures), grouped by the funder type assigned from the filer record. Click a group to see its members, amounts and filings. Individuals are never named.
Labor / unions · 1 · $2,500
NEBRASKA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PAC · PAC · Direct$2,500filings ↗
Ideological / issue PACs & groups · 4 · $67,750
DEMOCRACY NEBRASKA · PAC · Direct$50,000filings ↗
WAY BACK PAC · PAC · Direct$10,000filings ↗
PRESERVE THE GOOD LIFE · PAC · IE Support$5,000filings ↗
WOMEN WHO RUN NEBRASKA PAC · PAC · Direct$2,750filings ↗
Other candidate committees · 1 · $5,000
CONRAD FOR LEGISLATURE · Candidate committee · Direct$5,000filings ↗
Small PACs & organizations (under $1,000 each) · 10 · $4,368
CAMPAIGN FOR A HEALTHY NEBRASKA · PAC · Direct$750filings ↗
NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC PARTY · Party committee · Direct$711filings ↗
NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC WOMEN'S CAUCUS · Party committee · Direct$500filings ↗
NEBRASKA COOPERATIVE COUNCIL - POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · PAC · Direct$500filings ↗
LANCASTER COUNTY DEMOCRATS · Party committee · IE Support$490filings ↗
GAGE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY (DISSOLVED) · Party committee · Direct$400filings ↗
NEBRASKA RIGHT TO LIFE PAC · PAC · IE Oppose$366filings ↗
NEBRASKA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC NHAPAC · PAC · Direct$250filings ↗
NEBRASKA NURSES ASSOCIATION PAC · PAC · Direct$250filings ↗
VOTE VANESSA FOR LINCOLN AIRPORT AUTHORITY · Candidate committee · Direct$150filings ↗

Filings & sources

Payments to vendors

Top payee organizations this candidate's committee reported paying in this period (FEC/NADC expenditure filings, as of 2026-10-27). Lawful, itemized disclosures; not an indication of wrongdoing. Payments to individuals are aggregated. All vendors · rules
VendorPaymentsTotal
ETHOS3$42,000
MISSION CONTROL2$20,624
BLUEBERRY STRATEGIES LLC6$20,040
KWBE RADIO1$8,316
EAGLE PRINTING9$7,027
DAWGS HUT1$1,199
USPS.COM POSTAL STORE1$918
COLLEEN'S CATERING1$472
THE VOICE NEWS1$428
ACTBLUE (TECHNICAL SERVICES)1$189

Stances on key issues (2026 ballot)

Neutral summaries and short verbatim quotes from each candidate's own words: campaign websites, news interviews and the Nebraska Examiner voter-guide questionnaire. Every item links its source. Positions are never inferred from party, donors or endorsements, and no grades are given. The same issue list is used for every candidate. Methodology

Export stances · Verified public filings (14 rows ready)
Janet Bock
Legislature (nonpartisan ballot) · Legislative District 30 (LD-30)
Party: D (state party candidate list) source ↗
As of 2026-10-27
State issues
Property taxes & state budget
Examiner questionnaire (Budget): “It is crucial to emphasize funding for the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, which is critical to ensuring Nebraskans have the resources they need to thrive and succeed. Funding our public schools should also be prioritized in government spending.”
Questionnaire 2026 general-election guide · source ↗
Examiner questionnaire (Spending): “I would prioritize services from the Department of Health and Human Services for our state's most vulnerable. We should not, in good conscience, disrupt the care needed by citizens who require sustainable food sources and care.”
Questionnaire 2026 primary guide · source ↗
K-12 education / school choice
No position found in sources checked
Abortion
No position found in sources checked
Sports betting/gaming & 2026 ballot measures (440/441/442)
Examiner questionnaire (2026 Ballot Questions): “1) As a healthcare provider, I am hesitant about legalizing online sports betting. Regulations will need to be very clearly stated, and I look forward to learning more from the initiative as we approach the November election.”
Questionnaire 2026 general-election guide · source ↗
Guns
No position found in sources checked
Immigration
No position found in sources checked
Healthcare / Medicaid
No position found in sources checked
Agriculture, water & energy (OPPD/NPPD/NRDs)
Examiner questionnaire (Natural Resources/Data Centers): “I am extremely protective of Nebraska’s water supply. Air, water and soil quality must be maintained to feed Nebraska and the world. If the data indicates that any of those entities have been altered in any way, I would support banning data centers.”
Questionnaire 2026 general-election guide · source ↗
Elections / voting
Examiner questionnaire (Ballot Measures): “Voter-approved laws should not be prolonged, altered or ignored. Voters knew exactly what they were voting for, and their votes should be respected.”
Questionnaire 2026 primary guide · source ↗
Labor / right-to-work
No position found in sources checked
Crime / public safety
No position found in sources checked
Housing
No position found in sources checked

Coverage: 78 of 92 2026 general-election candidates have at least one sourced position; 6 have hand-researched campaign-site/interview items. Built 2026-10-27.