PL
Plains Ledger
Nebraska Political & Non Profit Financial Intelligence
⌘K /
Verified Primary Sources: NADC Open Data & Legacy Extracts (2015–Present) · FEC Schedule A / B / E & 24/48-Hr Notices · IRS Form 990 / BMF · USAspending.gov● Synced Oct 25, 2026 · Non-individual contributor policy enforced · Report a correction

Committee Comparison — PACs, Parties & Organizations (2025-26 cycle (partial))

Compare two committees or organizations — PAC vs. PAC, party vs. party, Super PAC vs. Super PAC — across funding sources, shared cross-over funders, transfers, top payees, and independent expenditures (support vs. oppose). Also compare two ballot measures or two election cycles.
This page compares committees and organizations (PACs, parties, Super PACs, unions, ballot committees). Candidate campaign committees are compared on Candidate Comparison.Compare candidates → Candidate Comparison
Comparison Export · Verified public filings (10 rows ready)
Committee Comparison — Funding Streams & Shared Funders

⚔ Committee vs. Committee — Funders, Shared Funders & Independent Expenditures

Side-by-side funding streams for two committees or organizations: conduit volume, labor, business, party and ideological PAC money, IE support/oppose, in-state vs. out-of-state share, and shared cross-over funders.

Box colors:RepublicanDemocraticIndependent (blue) / other party (gray)Nonpartisan office (party not shown)DSA funding tie Funding tie to a DSA-affiliated committee in filings (how badges work)The DSA logo identifies the organization named in public filings. Plains Ledger is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by DSA. A badge indicates a documented funding tie only.
Committee A (NADC)
VOTE YES FOR SCOTTSBLUFF AQUATICS AND SENIOR CENTER ↗
Ballot question committee · nadc-10553
$21.8K
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Committee B (NADC)
$519.5K
Direct Raised
🔵 ACTBLUE
$0
—
🔴 WINRED/ANEDOT
$0
—
📣 IE SUPPORT (+)
$0
Supporting IEs
⚔ IE OPPOSE (-)
$0
Opposing IEs
Funding side by side

VOTE YES FOR SCOTTSBLUFF AQUATICS AND SENIOR CENTER vs. NEBRASKA REALTORS PAC

Mirrored bars: A grows left, B grows right from the category spine. Bars in each group share one scale. Darker segment = in-state (NE), lighter = out-of-state.
A · VOTE YES FOR SCOTTSBLUFF AQUATICS AND SENIOR CENTER
Category
B · NEBRASKA REALTORS PAC
Direct contributions
$21.8K
Total raised
$519.5K
Online conduits
$0
ActBlue
$0
$0
WinRed / Anedot
$0
Outside spending (independent expenditures)
$0
IE support (+)
$0
$0
IE oppose (−)
$0
Itemized receipts by geography
$21.8K
100% of itemized
In-state (NE)
$590.9K
100% of itemized
$0
Out-of-state
$0
Committee & PAC sources
$0
Labor & unions
$0
$0
Business / trade
$0
$0
Party
$0
$0
Ideological / leadership
$0
Visual 3 · Dual-Candidate Network Graph (Exclusive vs. Shared / Cross-Over Ties)

All Funding Ties Network Map: VOTE YES FOR SCOTTSBLUFF AQUATICS AND SENIOR CENTER vs. NEBRASKA REALTORS PAC

Left column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to VOTE YES FOR SCOTTSBLUFF AQUATICS AND SENIOR CENTER; Center column highlights 0 Shared / Cross-Over Funders & Opposing Super PACs touching BOTH committees; Right column shows top funders/spenders exclusive to NEBRASKA REALTORS PAC. Click any node to inspect.
● ActBlue● WinRed/Anedot● Union / 501(c)(5)● Business / PAC━ IE Support (+)┅ IE Oppose (-)
EXCLUSIVE TO VOTE YES FOR SCOTTSBLU (3)CANDIDATE HUBS & SHARED / CROSS-OVER TIES (0)EXCLUSIVE TO NEBRASKA REALTORS PAC (0)0 Shared Institutional FundersCompletely distinct donor & Super PAC coalitionsVOTE YES FOR SCOTTSBLURaised $21.8K NEBRASKA REALTORS PACRaised $519.5K SECOND HOUSE COLLABORATIVEBusiness (For-Profit and N$12.5KNEBRASKA REALTORS PACPAC-Separate Segregated Po$2.5KPLATTE VALLEY COMPANIESBusiness (For-Profit and N$2.5K
Detailed list: all funding ties (3)
Visual 4 · Complete Side-by-Side Funding Ties Ledger

All Institutional Funders, Conduits, Unions & Super PAC IE Spenders (3 of 3)

Funder / Conduit / Super PACCategory & BasisVOTE YES FOR SCOTTSBLUFF AQUATICS AND SENIOR CENTER TieNEBRASKA REALTORS PAC TieCombined Volume
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
IRS Business Master File, normalized-name match (EIN 922387975, NE): 501(c)
$12,500
—$12,500
PAC-Separate Segregated Political Fund
NADC filer/source type "PAC-Separate Segregated Political Fund" (NADC ID 77
$2,500
—$2,500
PLATTE VALLEY COMPANIES
Business (For-Profit and Non-Profit entities)
$2,500
—$2,500

Committee-Level Expenditure & Vendor Inspector

Showing 407 committees in cycle
Region: Lincoln, NE (NE-01 (Lincoln / Eastern NE))
Gross Receipts
$21,770
Net: $19,270
Disbursements
$18,872
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 100% ($22K)Out-of-State: 0.0% ($0)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

Organization / PACStateAmount
SECOND HOUSE COLLABORATIVENE$12,500
PLATTE VALLEY COMPANIESNE$2,500
NEBRASKA REALTORS PACNE$2,500

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
NEBRASKA RURAL RADIO ASSNRADIIO AD PACKAGE, VIDEO AND BANNER ADS$10,004
DESIGN 4CAMPAIGN YARD SIGNS$2,440
ESSENTIAL FUEL LLCBILLBOARD ADS$300
MIDWEST THEATRERENTAL OF MIDWEST THEATRE FOR 2 TOWN HALL MEETINGS$200
STATE OF NEBRASKA - ACCOUNTABILITY AND DISCLOSURE COMMISSION (NADC)NADC FORM A1 FILING FEE$150
PAYEES WHO WERE PAID, EACH $250 OR LESS DURING THE REPORTING PERIODPLATTE VALLEY BANK SERVICE CHARGES$6
Region: Omaha, NE (NE-02 (Omaha / Douglas–Sarpy))
Gross Receipts
$519,466
Net: $519,466
Disbursements
$427,083
COH: $0
In-State (NE): 100% ($591K)Out-of-State: 0.0% ($0)

Top Non-Individual Contributors

No itemized non-individual contributors in this period.

Top Expenditure Payees / Vendors

Payee / VendorPurposeAmount
BOB EVNEN FOR NEBRASKALincoln$45,000
JEAN STOTHERT FOR OMAHAOmaha$30,000
TOM BECKIUS FOR CITY COUNCILLincoln$19,200
HARDING FOR COUNCILAMENDING CONTRIBUTION TO DATE CANDIDATE ACTUALLY RECEIVED CO$17,500
FRIENDS OF MIKE HILGERSLincoln$17,500
MELTON FOR OMAHAOmaha$15,000